Close
Updated:

Delivery-Driver Accident Claims in California — What Victims Need to Know

By Steven M. Sweat, Personal Injury Lawyers, APC

Delivery drivers — whether they work for Amazon Logistics, DoorDash, Uber Eats, Postmates, Instacart, or independent courier services — are everywhere in California. With more delivery vehicles on the road, crashes involving delivery drivers are increasingly common. If you’ve been injured in a crash involving a delivery driver, the claim can look more complicated than a “normal” car accident: questions about who was driving, who employed them (if anyone), whether they were on a run, and which insurance policies apply all matter a great deal.

This guide explains, in practical detail, how delivery-driver accident claims work in California: who can be held responsible, what evidence helps, how insurance and worker classification affect recovery, important deadlines, common pitfalls, and next steps. I’ll also point to resources and where to get help — including pages on victimslawyer.com that discuss delivery-driver and Amazon delivery claims in Los Angeles. (Steven M. Sweat)


Quick overview — the core rules (the elevator pitch)

  1. If a delivery driver causes a crash while performing delivery work, you may be able to hold multiple parties responsible — the driver, the company that hired them (or contracted with them), vehicle owners, vehicle maintenance companies, or other drivers. Which defendants matter depends on facts like whether the driver was “on-the-clock” and whether they were an employee or independent contractor.
  2. Strict deadlines apply. In most personal injury claims in California you must file a lawsuit within two years of the injury (Code of Civil Procedure § 335.1). Missing that deadline usually bars your case. (Justia Law)
  3. California uses pure comparative negligence. Even if you were partly at fault, you can usually recover damages, reduced by your percentage of fault. This makes pursuing claims still worthwhile in many cases.
  4. Gig-economy classification matters — but it’s complicated. Prop 22 and other legal decisions and statutes affect whether an app driver is an “employee” or “independent contractor,” which influence the company’s vicarious liability and insurance obligations. The legal landscape has changed substantially in recent years and remains fluid. (Reuters)

Read on for the full deep dive.


Typical parties who might be liable after a delivery-driver crash

In a delivery-driver crash, potential defendants can include:

  • The delivery driver — negligence by the driver (speeding, running a red light, distracted driving) is the most direct basis for an injury claim.
  • The delivery company or platform — if the driver was an employee or the company is vicariously liable for acts of drivers while they are performing company work. Whether the company is liable depends on whether the driver was acting within the scope of their employment or controlled by the company.
  • The vehicle owner — if the vehicle is owned by someone else (a delivery co-op, franchise, leasing company), that owner can be responsible.
  • Third parties — defective vehicle parts, poor road maintenance, or another negligent driver can also be defendants.
  • Commercial carriers / fleet operators — for large parcel deliveries (UPS, FedEx Ground, Amazon Logistics), there may be deeper pockets and different insurance structures.

Which parties are worth pursuing depends on the facts. For example, Amazon delivery vehicles and drivers often have different insurance and corporate structures than bicycle couriers working for an app.

(If you want to see how we handle Amazon delivery claims in Los Angeles, we explain common scenarios on our Amazon delivery page.) (Steven M. Sweat)


Employer liability: employees, independent contractors, and the gig economy

A central question in many delivery-driver cases is whether the company that hired — or contracted with — the driver can be held responsible for the driver’s negligence.

  • If the driver is an employee acting within the scope of employment, the employer is typically vicariously liable for the driver’s negligence. In plain English: if the driver is on a delivery and crashes while delivering, the employer’s insurance often must pay.
  • If the driver is an independent contractor, the company is generally not vicariously liable for the driver’s negligence — but there are important exceptions (e.g., negligent hiring, supervision, vehicle maintenance; special contractual obligations; or if the company exerted enough control to render the driver effectively an employee).
  • App-based drivers: California’s regulatory and case law landscape (AB5, Dynamex, Proposition 22, and subsequent litigation/legislation) has created a shifting environment about how app drivers are classified and what protections they have. The California Supreme Court decisions and Proposition 22 rulings have changed how courts and companies analyze liability; as a result, whether a delivery platform is automatically on the hook is a case-by-case question. (Reuters)

Bottom line: classification affects who’s responsible — but even when drivers are labeled independent contractors, plaintiffs often identify other legal routes to recover from the company (for instance, by showing the company’s operational control over drivers or negligence in vetting/training).


Insurance — who pays?

Understanding which insurance applies is critical in delivery-driver cases. Possible insurance sources include:

1. Driver’s personal auto insurance

Most drivers have personal auto policies that may provide primary coverage for accidents. But many personal policies exclude coverage for commercial use (e.g., using the vehicle to make deliveries), and insurers may deny coverage if the policy excludes business use.

2. Delivery company or platform insurance

Some platforms maintain commercial policies that cover drivers while they are on delivery. Large carriers and some apps provide varying levels of contingent or primary commercial liability (check the company’s terms and state law).

3. Commercial vehicle insurance or fleet policy

Large fleets (e.g., Amazon Logistics subcontractors, FedEx, UPS) commonly have commercial policies with higher limits.

4. Uninsured / Underinsured Motorist (UM/UIM)

If the at-fault party lacks insurance or has inadequate limits, your own UM/UIM coverage may cover your damages. In California, UM/UIM coverage follows the policy terms — and in some cases you can make a claim under your own policy even if the at-fault party is uninsured. This can be an important source of recovery. (If you want to explore options and coverage in your area, see our food delivery app accident page.) (Steven M. Sweat)

Practical implications

  • Quickly identify the vehicles and companies involved.
  • Report the accident to your insurer and preserve claim numbers.
  • Be careful giving recorded statements to insurance companies without advice from counsel — adjusters often look for ways to limit payouts.

Common factual patterns (and how liability usually plays out)

Here are common scenarios and the legal issues they raise:

Scenario A: A delivery van (company-owned) hits you while making deliveries

Likely result: The fleet owner or company’s commercial insurance will often respond. Employer vicarious liability is a strong theory if the driver was on duty. Gather delivery logs, GPS timestamps, dashcam or app telemetry — these are crucial.

Scenario B: A gig-app bicycle courier or scooter rider collides with you

Likely result: If the courier works for an app classified as an independent contractor, holding the platform liable is more complex. Still, the courier’s own liability insurance (if any) and your UM/UIM coverage are first stops. If the platform supplied equipment, training, or controlled routing heavily, you may have arguments to link the platform. (Reuters)

Scenario C: An Amazon Logistics contractor (sub-contracted driver) causes the crash

Likely result: Liability may fall on the independent contractor, the contractor’s company, or potentially Amazon depending on the relationship and facts. These cases often involve corporate and discovery-heavy fights to get internal documents and policies. See our Amazon delivery page for typical examples. (Steven M. Sweat)


Evidence that makes or breaks a delivery-driver case

When you or your attorney build a claim, the following evidence types are critical:

  • Police report — the on-scene report and any witness statements taken by officers.
  • Photos and video — crash scene, vehicle damage, skid marks, traffic signals, nearby cameras, dashcams, phone videos.
  • Traffic-camera or door-bell camera footage — many delivery events are caught on nearby cameras.
  • Delivery app data / GPS / timestamps — app logs often show whether the driver was “on a delivery,” pickup/dropoff timestamps, route, and speed/ETAs.
  • Cellphone / telematics records — can show whether the driver was using a phone, whether distracted, or the timing of events.
  • Maintenance and inspection records — for fleet vehicles, maintenance logs can point to negligent upkeep.
  • Employment/contract documents — agreements between driver and company, company policies, training manuals, directives that show control.
  • Medical records — objective proof of injuries, treatment, surgery, and ongoing care.
  • Witness statements and expert reports — accident reconstruction experts can be decisive in complex crashes.

Requests for app logs and company materials are common in litigation (via discovery). If you don’t preserve evidence quickly, apps may rotate or delete logs, dashcam footage may be overwritten, and witnesses can be harder to locate.


The legal elements: proving negligence in California

To succeed in a typical auto negligence claim you must prove:

  1. Duty — the driver owed a duty to drive carefully (automatic).
  2. Breach — the driver failed that duty (speeding, running a light, distraction).
  3. Causation — the breach caused the crash and your injuries.
  4. Damages — actual losses: medical bills, lost wages, pain & suffering, property damage.

In delivery-driver claims you may also need to prove vicarious liability (company is liable for driver) or negligent hiring/supervision (company may be independently negligent if it failed to vet a driver, ignored complaints, or placed an unfit driver on the road). Expert testimony — accident reconstruction, vocational experts, and economic loss calculations — often strengthens causation and damages proofs.


Damages you can recover

Damages in California typically include:

  • Economic damages: past and future medical bills, lost wages, reduced earning capacity, car repairs, out-of-pocket costs.
  • Non-economic damages: pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life.
  • Punitive damages: rarely available, but possible where defendant’s conduct was intentional, malicious, or extremely reckless.
  • Special categories: loss of consortium for family members, and in wrongful-death cases, statutory survival damages and funeral costs.

Your attorney will calculate a damages demand that combines documented costs (medical bills, pay stubs) with reasonable estimates of future care and compensation for pain/suffering.


Comparative fault — what if you were partly to blame?

California follows pure comparative negligence, which means you can recover even if you are mostly at fault; your award is reduced by your percentage of fault. For example, if a jury finds you 30% at fault and total damages of $100,000, you would recover $70,000. This rule is plaintiff-friendly compared to states that bar recovery if a plaintiff is over 50% at fault.

Insurance companies frequently try to assign more fault to the injured person to reduce payouts. Document your actions (e.g., you were stopped at a red light, wearing a seat belt, obeying traffic laws) and preserve any counter-evidence (camera footage, witness testimony).


Statute of limitations and timing — don’t wait

Most personal injury claims in California must be filed within two years of the injury under CCP § 335.1. There are exceptions for claims against public entities (shorter notice requirements) and other specialized facts, but the two-year rule is the usual deadline. If you think you might want to sue, contact a lawyer early — preserving evidence and filing on time is crucial. (Justia Law)


Workers’ compensation vs. personal injury claims — which applies?

If a delivery driver is injured while working, they typically look to workers’ compensation for their own injuries. But if you (a third party) are injured by a delivery driver, you pursue a personal injury claim against the driver (and possibly the employer/company). Conversely, if you were a passenger employed by the carrier or a co-worker injured on a delivery, workers’ comp might be at play for your benefits.

One wrinkle: some app drivers are classified as independent contractors (not employees), meaning workers’ comp may not apply to them. The legal classification debates (AB5, Prop 22, related cases) have significant implications for both worker protections and third-party claim strategies. (Reuters)


What to do right after a delivery-driver crash — checklist (immediately)

  1. Get medical attention — your health comes first. Seek treatment immediately; delay can hurt both recovery and later claims.
  2. Call law enforcement — get a police report. This creates an official record of the collision.
  3. Collect evidence: photos of vehicles, injuries, scene, traffic signals; witness names and numbers; license plate numbers.
  4. Get delivery app details: note any visible branding, driver name, vehicle number, or employer signage. If safe, take a photo of the driver’s app screen or delivery bag.
  5. Preserve video: ask nearby businesses or homeowners if they have camera footage. Doorbell cams often capture delivery events.
  6. Report to insurers — report to your insurer and get the claim number. Be cautious providing unsupervised recorded statements.
  7. Keep receipts and records — medical bills, prescriptions, lost wages documentation, repairs.
  8. Contact an experienced attorney — ideally one with experience in delivery and commercial carrier claims. They know where to request app logs, GPS, and maintenance records.

If you want a legal consultation and help with evidence collection, our food delivery app accident and Amazon delivery pages have more detail and a way to contact our office. (Steven M. Sweat)


Dealing with delivery platforms: what to expect

Delivery platforms (DoorDash, Uber Eats, Instacart, etc.) often have complex insurance matrices:

  • They may provide contingent liability only while the driver is actively on delivery.
  • Some platforms rely on drivers’ own coverage first.
  • Platforms’ Terms of Service and driver agreements frequently contain arbitration clauses, disclaimer language, or contract terms that complicate claims (especially if the injured party contracted with the platform directly). However, many third-party injured people (pedestrians, other drivers) are not bound by driver-platform contracts and can sue in court.

If a platform invokes immunity or arbitration, an attorney will review the relationships and the platform’s terms. For corporate fleets (Amazon Logistics, UPS, FedEx), the company’s internal operations, contract networks, and subcontract arrangements often become focal points of litigation.


Discovery: getting the company’s app logs, GPS and internal records

One of the most powerful tools for plaintiffs in delivery-driver cases is discovery — court-ordered requests for documents. Useful items to seek include:

  • Driver GPS and route logs
  • App “status” timestamps (pickup, en route, delivered)
  • Driver personnel files, safety records, background checks
  • Maintenance and inspection logs for fleet vehicles
  • Internal safety policies and training materials
  • Complaints or incident reports involving the driver

Sometimes platforms resist producing these records; an attorney can obtain them through subpoenas or court orders. Time is of the essence — many platforms overwrite telemetry data if not preserved. That’s another reason to act promptly after an accident.


Settlement vs. trial — what typically happens

Most personal injury cases resolve in settlements before trial. Insurance companies often prefer settlement to avoid trial costs and unpredictable jury awards. Still, complex delivery-driver cases (especially those involving corporate defendants, vigorous denial of responsibility, or disputed app logs) may require litigation and trial preparation.

A few practical points:

  • Demand package: your attorney will assemble medical records, wage loss documentation, photos, expert opinions, and a damages demand. This is the starting point for negotiations.
  • Mediation is common before trial — a neutral mediator helps the parties discuss settlement options.
  • Trial: if settlement fails, parties can try the case to a judge or jury. Trial expenses and discovery can be extensive especially when large corporate defendants are involved.

Special issues in bicycle / scooter / pedestrian delivery crashes

When a delivery cyclist or scooter rider hits a pedestrian or is in a collision with a vehicle, there are special considerations:

  • Helmet and safety gear are strong evidence—if the rider lacked them, insurers may argue contributory negligence.
  • Right-of-way and lane usage issues (bike lanes, sidewalks) can be contested.
  • App logs may show whether the rider was rushing between deliveries, which can be used to establish negligence.
  • Insurance gaps: many bicycle couriers have minimal insurance, so plaintiff UM/UIM coverage or company policies become more important.

Five practical tips to maximize your recovery

  1. Document everything from day one — photos, medical visits, correspondence, lost wages.
  2. Preserve evidence — ask your lawyer to send preservation letters to the company and request app telemetry and dashcam footage quickly.
  3. Don’t admit fault or give unsupervised recorded statements to insurers — a short factual report is fine, but recorded statements can be used against you.
  4. Get prompt medical care and follow treatment recommendations — delayed care looks bad to juries and insurers.
  5. Work with counsel experienced in delivery/commerce claims — there are special discovery tools and defenses in these matters.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: Can I sue the delivery company or only the driver?
A: You can sue anyone responsible — the driver and, depending on the case, the company. Whether the company is legally required to defend or pay will depend on employment classification, control over drivers, and contractual structures. Often you can at least obtain valuable discovery from the company even if vicarious liability is contested.

Q: What is the statute of limitations for injury claims in California?
A: Generally two years from the date of injury under CCP § 335.1. There are special rules for suits against government entities that shorten the deadline for filing a claim or notice. Act immediately to avoid losing rights. (Justia Law)

Q: If the driver is uninsured, what can I do?
A: If the at-fault driver lacks insurance or has inadequate limits, your UM/UIM coverage may help. You also can pursue the driver personally, although practical recovery depends on the driver’s assets. Pursuing the delivery company (if viable) or your own insurer can be alternate routes. (Steven M. Sweat)

Q: Will my percentage of fault reduce my recovery?
A: Yes. California’s pure comparative negligence rule reduces your recovery by your percentage of fault, but it does not bar recovery even if you were largely at fault.

Q: Are app platforms immune from lawsuits?
A: No blanket immunity. Proposition 22 and other rulings affect worker classification, but they don’t automatically shield platforms from third-party liability or claims based on negligence, negligent hiring, or operational control. The specifics are heavily fact-dependent. (Reuters)


How we can help (and links to resources)

If you or a loved one were injured in an accident involving a delivery driver in Los Angeles or elsewhere in California, you’re not alone — these cases are common and often involve complicated corporate and insurance issues. Our firm has experience with food delivery app accidents and commercial delivery (including Amazon delivery) claims. You can read more about food delivery app accidents and Amazon delivery claims on our site:

Calling an experienced attorney early helps preserve crucial evidence (GPS, app logs, dashcam footage) and avoids common mistakes that can reduce recoveries.


Closing thoughts — act now, protect your claim

Delivery-driver accidents present some unique challenges — mixed insurance pictures, shifting worker classifications, and buried telemetry or app evidence. But with prompt action, careful evidence preservation, and experienced representation, victims often recover meaningful compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

If you were injured in a delivery-driver crash, don’t let deadlines or lost evidence cost you your claim. Seek medical care, document the scene, and consult an attorney who knows how to obtain the app and corporate records that often make or break these cases. For more information or to schedule a consultation, visit our food delivery app accident page or our Amazon delivery page linked above. (Steven M. Sweat)


Sources and further reading (selected)

  • California Code of Civil Procedure § 335.1 (statute of limitations for injuries). (Justia Law)
  • Coverage and news on gig-driver classification, Prop 22, and recent developments. (Reuters)
  • Victimslawyer.com — Amazon delivery and food delivery app accident pages for Los Angeles. (Steven M. Sweat)

 

Contact Us